We rethought the typical indemnification clause
X.X. Provider’s Obligations to Handle Cloud Services IP Claims. If Customer receives a Service Infringement Claim from an Outside Entity (including after the end of a Service Period), and that Claim is not solely the result of Customer’s Improper Customization; Customer’s use of a Trial or Pre-Release Feature; or the Provider’s implementation of Customer’s specifications, instructions, or requirements; and Customer complies with the requirements in the Section “Claim Coordination” below, then, at its own expense, Provider shall do the following as Customer’s only legal remedies for that Claim:
{"name":"Claims involving Trials and Pre-Release","addText":"If the claim involves the Customer’s use of a Trial or Pre-Release Feature, the Provider's obligations shall be limited to ..."}
X.X. Customer’s Obligations. Customer will have the following obligations to handle claims arising from misuse.
If Provider receives a Claim from an Outside Entity (including after the end of a Service Period) and that Claim arises from Customer’s Infringing or Unlawful Content{"name":"Narrower claims - Infringement only", "deleteText":", Customer's violation of the \u201cProhibited Data\u201d Section, or Customer's use of the Cloud Services for a High Risk Activity or unlawful purpose"}, and Provider complies with the requirements in the “Claim Coordination” Section, then, at its own expense, Customer shall do the following:
X.X. Claim Coordination. To receive the benefit of the other party’s obligations in this Section “Handling Claims from Others”, a party must:
Indemnities are often over-broad, under-defined, and hard to use when it matters. Our version is focused and practical, easier to agree on, and easier to act on when a real claim hits. In this rewrite, we scoped the clause to cover only the claims clearly caused by one side’s actions. Then we paired it with a practical framework for how defense, payment, and resolution should work